💰 Unit Cost Winner DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) $0.22/1M in · $0.65/1M out
⚡ Latency & Speed Winner DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) 310ms TTFT · 165 tok/s
💻 Coding (SWE) Winner DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) 77.4% SWE-bench · 94.5% HumanEval
🧠 STEM Reasoning Winner DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) 91.3% GPQA · 96.4% MATH-500

Which model is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) or GPT-5?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) outperforms GPT-5 with an 11.4x cost advantage and superior capability. It cuts input pricing by 91.2% ($0.22 vs. $2.50) and output to $0.65 vs. $10.00 per 1M tokens. DeepSeek also achieves a faster 310ms TTFT and 165 tok/s, while leading SWE-bench Verified (77.4% vs. 74.9%) and GPQA Diamond (91.3% vs. 85.4%).
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)

Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.

Metric / Dimension DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) GPT-5 Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $0.22 $2.50 DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 11.4x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $0.65 $10.00 DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (93.5% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M $0.007 $0.625 DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 90.6x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M $0.22 $2.50 DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 11.4x cheaper
Context Window (Max Output) 1,049k (128k out) 410k (128k out) DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (2.6x larger context)
Avg TTFT Response Latency 310ms 340ms DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (30ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput) 165 tok/s 105 tok/s DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (+60 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 77.4% 74.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (+2.5% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM) 91.3% 85.4% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (+5.9% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline) 87.3% 90.8% GPT-5 (+3.5% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic) 96.4% 98% GPT-5 (+1.6% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 81.6 / 100 59.2 / 100 DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (+22.4 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.

25.0M Tokens
500K 50M 250M 500M+
5.0M Tokens
100K 25M 75M 150M+
50% Cached
0% (Uncached) 25% 50% (Typical Agent) 95% Max

Estimated Monthly Spend

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) $6.09

$0.22/1M in · $0.65/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.007/1M read · $0.22/1M write

GPT-5 $89.06

$2.50/1M in · $10.00/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.625/1M read · $2.50/1M write

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$82.98 / mo
(93.2% lower cost with DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp))
Open Full Matchup Analysis →
A

When to Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (DeepSeek) for ultra-low-cost open-weight multimodal MoE built for high-throughput visual document OCR, chart interpretation, and real-time autonomous coding agents — offering a 1,048k context window, 310ms TTFT, and $0.22/1M input pricing ($0.007/1M cached reads).

B

When to Choose GPT-5

Choose GPT-5 (OpenAI) for complex enterprise automation, full-stack software engineering, multimodal agent orchestration, and scientific synthesis — offering a 409k context window, 340ms TTFT, and $2.50/1M input pricing ($0.625/1M cached reads).

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) or GPT-5?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is cheaper at $0.22/1M input tokens ($0.65/1M output) compared to $2.50/1M input ($10.00/1M output) for GPT-5.

Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) or GPT-5?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers faster first-token latency at 310ms TTFT (165 tok/s throughput) compared to 340ms TTFT (105 tok/s) for GPT-5.

How do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) and GPT-5 compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?

On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) scores 77.4% versus 74.9% for GPT-5. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) scores 91.3% versus 85.4% for GPT-5 (and 96.4% vs 98% on MATH-500).

When should you choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (DeepSeek) for ultra-low-cost open-weight multimodal MoE built for high-throughput visual document OCR, chart interpretation, and real-time autonomous coding agents — offering a 1,048k context window, 310ms TTFT, and $0.22/1M input pricing ($0.007/1M cached reads).

When should you choose GPT-5?

Choose GPT-5 (OpenAI) for complex enterprise automation, full-stack software engineering, multimodal agent orchestration, and scientific synthesis — offering a 409k context window, 340ms TTFT, and $2.50/1M input pricing ($0.625/1M cached reads).

Explore High-Priority Related Model Matchups