DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)
MIT Open SourceDeveloped by DeepSeek · 285B/13B Sparse MoE with 32-Layer ViT & DSpark Speculative Decoding · Modalities: Text, Vision · Released 2026-02-10
What are the token costs and operational benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)?
Verified Capability Benchmarks
Composite Intelligence: 86.5/100Architectural & Production Profile
Ultra-low-cost multimodal open-weight model featuring Multi-head Latent Attention v4 and a 1M token context window.
Ultra-low-cost open-weight multimodal MoE built for high-throughput visual document OCR, chart interpretation, and real-time autonomous coding agents.
- Architecture
- 285B/13B Sparse MoE with 32-Layer ViT & DSpark Speculative Decoding
- Modalities
- Text, Vision
- Max Output Tokens
- 128,000 tokens
- Blended Rate (3:1)
- $0.328 / 1M
Verified Cloud Inference Endpoints Hosting DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)
Compare latency, streaming speed, and token pricing across cloud API providers.
| Inference Provider | Role | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Avg TTFT | Throughput |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek Platform → | Primary Host | $0.22 | $0.65 | 310ms | 165 tok/s |
| Anysphere Cursor Router → | Partner Endpoint | $0.22 | $0.65 | 320ms | 181.5 tok/s |
Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster
Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.
Estimated Monthly Spend
$0.22/1M in · $0.65/1M out
Prompt Cache: $0.007/1M read · $0.22/1M write
$2.00/1M in · $10.00/1M out
Prompt Cache: $0.100/1M read · $0.50/1M write
Head-to-Head Comparisons Involving DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) (36)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 4 Argon
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers a 9.1x cost advantage and superior speed, while Gemini 4 Argon leads in peak capability. DeepSeek cuts input pricing by 89.0% ($0.22 vs. $2.00) and output to $0.65 vs. $10.00, achieving 310ms TTFT (540ms faster) and 165 tok/s. Conversely, Gemini wins SWE-bench (84.5% vs. 77.4%) and GPQA Diamond (93.8% vs. 91.3%).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers superior capability at a 92.7% lower input cost ($0.22 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $15.00 output. Outperforming Claude 4.5 Sonnet, it achieves faster 310ms latency (70ms advantage), 165 vs. 84 tok/s throughput, and higher scores on SWE-bench Verified (77.4% vs. 75.8%) and GPQA Diamond (91.3% vs. 84.2%).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Claude Opus 5.5
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 94.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $4.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $20.00 for output tokens (18.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (370ms faster than Claude Opus 5.5) with 165 vs. 95 tok/s throughput. Claude Opus 5.5 leads coding evaluations at 89.9% SWE-bench Verified vs. 77.4% for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) and 93.2% vs. 91.3% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers superior capability at lower costs, while Gemini 3.8 Flash wins on speed. DeepSeek is 12.0% cheaper on input ($0.22 vs. $0.25) and $0.65 vs. $1.50 on output, leading SWE-bench (77.4% vs. 68.5%) and GPQA (91.3% vs. 79.2%). Gemini delivers 105ms TTFT (205ms faster) and 210 vs. 165 tok/s throughput.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GPT-5
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) outperforms GPT-5 with an 11.4x cost advantage and superior capability. It cuts input pricing by 91.2% ($0.22 vs. $2.50) and output to $0.65 vs. $10.00 per 1M tokens. DeepSeek also achieves a faster 310ms TTFT and 165 tok/s, while leading SWE-bench Verified (77.4% vs. 74.9%) and GPQA Diamond (91.3% vs. 85.4%).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GPT-6 Astra
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 97.8% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $10.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $50.00 for output tokens (45.5x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (430ms faster than GPT-6 Astra) with 165 vs. 74 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 75.7% for GPT-6 Astra and 91.3% vs. 96.0% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 83.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $1.32 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $3.96 for output tokens (6.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (210ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Pro) with 165 vs. 78 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Pro leads coding evaluations at 80.6% SWE-bench Verified vs. 77.4% for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) and 90.1% vs. 91.3% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) outperforms DeepSeek R1 across capability, speed, and cost. V4 cuts input pricing by 60.0% ($0.22 vs. $0.55) and output to $0.65 vs. $2.19 per 1M tokens. It leads SWE-bench Verified (77.4% vs. 49.2%) and GPQA Diamond (91.3% vs. 71.5%), achieving 310ms TTFT (1140ms faster) at 165 vs. 58 tok/s.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs OpenAI o3
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) outperforms OpenAI o3 in cost, speed, and capability. DeepSeek is 89.0% cheaper on input ($0.22 vs. $2.00) and $0.65 vs. $8.00 on output per 1M tokens. It achieves 310ms latency (840ms faster), 165 vs. 82 tok/s throughput, and leads SWE-bench Verified (77.4% vs. 71.7%) and GPQA Diamond (91.3% vs. 87.7%).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Claude 4 Opus
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 98.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $15.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $75.00 for output tokens (68.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (610ms faster than Claude 4 Opus) with 165 vs. 46 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 77.2% for Claude 4 Opus and 91.3% vs. 87.1% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) dominates Claude 3.7 Sonnet in cost and capability. DeepSeek is 92.7% cheaper for input ($0.22 vs. $3.00) and costs $0.65 vs. $15.00 for output. It delivers a 310ms TTFT (230ms faster), 165 vs. 72 tok/s throughput, and leads on SWE-bench Verified (77.4% vs. 70.3%) and GPQA Diamond (91.3% vs. 78.5%).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 82.4% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $1.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (5.7x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (110ms faster than Gemini 3.1 Pro) with 165 vs. 98 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 71.8% for Gemini 3.1 Pro and 91.3% vs. 82.4% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Grok 4
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 91.2% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $2.50 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $12.50 for output tokens (11.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (170ms faster than Grok 4) with 165 vs. 95 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 73.2% for Grok 4 and 91.3% vs. 86.2% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick is 9.1% cheaper for input tokens ($0.20 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.60 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Llama 4 Maverick delivers lower response latency at 135ms TTFT (175ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 175 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 62.4% for Llama 4 Maverick and 91.3% vs. 73.8% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next outperforms DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) across cost, speed, and capability. Qwen is 27.3% cheaper on input ($0.16 vs. $0.22) and costs $0.47 vs. $0.65 per 1M output tokens. It delivers 280ms TTFT (30ms faster), 185 vs. 165 tok/s throughput, and leads SWE-bench Verified (81.0% vs. 77.4%) and GPQA Diamond (91.7% vs. 91.3%).
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 65.9% cheaper for input tokens ($0.07 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.30 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (2.9x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite delivers lower response latency at 78ms TTFT (232ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 265 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 55.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and 91.3% vs. 68.4% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs OpenAI o4-mini
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 80.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $1.10 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $4.40 for output tokens (5.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (370ms faster than OpenAI o4-mini) with 165 vs. 125 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.1% for OpenAI o4-mini and 91.3% vs. 81.4% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 is 36.4% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.28 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.6x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (100ms faster than DeepSeek V3) with 165 vs. 78 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 42.0% for DeepSeek V3 and 91.3% vs. 59.1% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemma 4 31B IT
Gemma 4 31B IT is 45.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.36 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.8x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemma 4 31B IT delivers lower response latency at 115ms TTFT (195ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 155 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 59.2% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 91.3% vs. 71.2% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs OpenAI o3-mini
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 80.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $1.10 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $4.40 for output tokens (5.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (640ms faster than OpenAI o3-mini) with 165 vs. 98 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 49.3% for OpenAI o3-mini and 91.3% vs. 79.7% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 72.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $0.80 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $4.00 for output tokens (3.6x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Claude 3.5 Haiku delivers lower response latency at 190ms TTFT (120ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 130 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 40.6% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 91.3% vs. 41.6% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 92.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (13.6x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Both models demonstrate comparable response latency around 310ms TTFT (80 vs. 165 tok/s). DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 49.0% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 91.3% vs. 59.4% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 54.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.10 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.40 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (2.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 2.0 Flash delivers lower response latency at 280ms TTFT (30ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 185 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 51.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash and 91.3% vs. 63.6% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 26.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $0.30 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $2.50 for output tokens (1.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 2.5 Flash delivers lower response latency at 110ms TTFT (200ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 180 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 58.0% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 91.3% vs. 70.5% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 82.4% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $1.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (5.7x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (390ms faster than Gemini 2.5 Pro) with 165 vs. 80 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 63.8% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 91.3% vs. 74.0% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GLM-5.3
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 37.1% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $0.35 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $1.00 for output tokens (1.6x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, GLM-5.3 delivers lower response latency at 160ms TTFT (150ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 120 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 56.0% for GLM-5.3 and 91.3% vs. 67.0% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash is 45.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.40 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.8x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, GLM-5.3-Flash delivers lower response latency at 90ms TTFT (220ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 175 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 52.8% for GLM-5.3-Flash and 91.3% vs. 63.5% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 91.2% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $2.50 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (11.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, GPT-4o delivers lower response latency at 280ms TTFT (30ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 100 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 48.0% for GPT-4o and 91.3% vs. 53.6% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini is 31.8% cheaper for input tokens ($0.15 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.60 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.5x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, GPT-4o Mini delivers lower response latency at 220ms TTFT (90ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 140 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 41.0% for GPT-4o Mini and 91.3% vs. 40.2% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs GPT-6.1 Sol
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 89.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (9.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (210ms faster than GPT-6.1 Sol) with 165 vs. 135 tok/s throughput. GPT-6.1 Sol leads coding evaluations at 86.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 77.4% for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) and 92.4% vs. 91.3% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Grok 3
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 92.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (13.6x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (310ms faster than Grok 3) with 165 vs. 88 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 65.8% for Grok 3 and 91.3% vs. 84.6% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Grok 3 Mini
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 26.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $0.30 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $1.20 for output tokens (1.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Grok 3 Mini delivers lower response latency at 150ms TTFT (160ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 160 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 54.0% for Grok 3 Mini and 91.3% vs. 68.0% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 45.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.30 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.8x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct delivers lower response latency at 145ms TTFT (165ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 165 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 42.5% for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 91.3% vs. 55.6% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Mistral Large 2 (2411)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 89.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $6.00 for output tokens (9.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (70ms faster than Mistral Large 2 (2411)) with 165 vs. 75 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 45.2% for Mistral Large 2 (2411) and 91.3% vs. 54.2% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs o1
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) is 98.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.22 vs. $15.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.65 vs. $60.00 for output tokens (68.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers lower response latency at 310ms TTFT (2290ms faster than o1) with 165 vs. 48 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 48.9% for o1 and 91.3% vs. 78.0% on GPQA Diamond.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) vs Qwen 3.8 27B
Qwen 3.8 27B is 9.1% cheaper for input tokens ($0.20 vs. $0.22 per 1M tokens) and $0.60 vs. $0.65 for output tokens (1.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Qwen 3.8 27B delivers lower response latency at 120ms TTFT (190ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)) with 140 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) leads coding evaluations at 77.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 58.4% for Qwen 3.8 27B and 91.3% vs. 68.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Frequently Asked Questions & Query Fan-Out
How much does DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) cost per 1M tokens including prompt caching?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) costs $0.22 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens. Cached input reads cost $0.007 per 1M tokens, reducing repeated context costs by 97%.
What are DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)'s coding and reasoning benchmark scores?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) achieves 77.4% on SWE-bench Verified, 94.5% on HumanEval coding, 91.3% on GPQA Diamond graduate-level science, 87.3% on MMLU-Pro, and 96.4% on MATH-500, earning an overall Inference Value Ratio (IVR) of 81.6/100.
What is the context window, TTFT latency, and token throughput of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) supports a 1,048,576 token context window (128,000 max output tokens) and operates at 310ms average Time to First Token (TTFT) with 165 tokens/sec output streaming throughput.
What are the primary production use cases for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)?
Ultra-low-cost open-weight multimodal MoE built for high-throughput visual document OCR, chart interpretation, and real-time autonomous coding agents.