💰 Unit Cost Winner Grok 3 Mini $0.30/1M in · $1.20/1M out
⚡ Latency & Speed Winner Grok 3 Mini 150ms TTFT · 160 tok/s
💻 Coding (SWE) Winner GLM-5.3 56% SWE-bench · 91.5% HumanEval
🧠 STEM Reasoning Winner Grok 3 Mini 68% GPQA · 87% MATH-500

Which model is better: GLM-5.3 or Grok 3 Mini?

Grok 3 Mini is 14.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.30 vs. $0.35 per 1M tokens) and $1.20 vs. $1.00 for output tokens (1.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Grok 3 Mini delivers lower response latency at 150ms TTFT (10ms faster than GLM-5.3) with 160 vs. 120 tok/s throughput. GLM-5.3 leads coding evaluations at 56.0% SWE-bench Verified vs. 54.0% for Grok 3 Mini and 67.0% vs. 68.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)

Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.

Metric / Dimension GLM-5.3 Grok 3 Mini Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $0.35 $0.30 Grok 3 Mini is 1.2x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $1.00 $1.20 GLM-5.3 (16.7% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M $0.090 $0.080 Grok 3 Mini is 1.1x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M $0.35 $0.30 Grok 3 Mini is 1.2x cheaper
Context Window (Max Output) 131k (16k out) 131k (16k out) Equal Context Window
Avg TTFT Response Latency 160ms 150ms Grok 3 Mini (10ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput) 120 tok/s 160 tok/s Grok 3 Mini (+40 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 56% 54% GLM-5.3 (+2.0% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM) 67% 68% Grok 3 Mini (+1.0% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline) 80.5% 80% GLM-5.3 (+0.5% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic) 88% 87% GLM-5.3 (+1.0% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 69.9 / 100 69.2 / 100 GLM-5.3 (+0.7 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.

25.0M Tokens
500K 50M 250M 500M+
5.0M Tokens
100K 25M 75M 150M+
50% Cached
0% (Uncached) 25% 50% (Typical Agent) 95% Max

Estimated Monthly Spend

GLM-5.3 $10.50

$0.35/1M in · $1.00/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.090/1M read · $0.35/1M write

Grok 3 Mini $10.75

$0.30/1M in · $1.20/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.080/1M read · $0.30/1M write

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$0.25 / mo
(2.3% lower cost with GLM-5.3)
Open Full Matchup Analysis →
A

When to Choose GLM-5.3

Choose GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) for bilingual flagship foundation model optimized for cross-lingual reasoning, long-form structured analysis, and enterprise tool execution — offering a 131k context window, 160ms TTFT, and $0.35/1M input pricing ($0.090/1M cached reads).

B

When to Choose Grok 3 Mini

Choose Grok 3 Mini (xAI) for high-speed reasoning model providing rapid answers and code generation with chain-of-thought capabilities at edge pricing — offering a 131k context window, 150ms TTFT, and $0.30/1M input pricing ($0.080/1M cached reads).

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: GLM-5.3 or Grok 3 Mini?

Grok 3 Mini is cheaper at $0.30/1M input tokens ($1.20/1M output) compared to $0.35/1M input ($1.00/1M output) for GLM-5.3.

Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: GLM-5.3 or Grok 3 Mini?

Grok 3 Mini delivers faster first-token latency at 150ms TTFT (160 tok/s throughput) compared to 160ms TTFT (120 tok/s) for GLM-5.3.

How do GLM-5.3 and Grok 3 Mini compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?

On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, GLM-5.3 scores 56% versus 54% for Grok 3 Mini. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, GLM-5.3 scores 67% versus 68% for Grok 3 Mini (and 88% vs 87% on MATH-500).

When should you choose GLM-5.3?

Choose GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) for bilingual flagship foundation model optimized for cross-lingual reasoning, long-form structured analysis, and enterprise tool execution — offering a 131k context window, 160ms TTFT, and $0.35/1M input pricing ($0.090/1M cached reads).

When should you choose Grok 3 Mini?

Choose Grok 3 Mini (xAI) for high-speed reasoning model providing rapid answers and code generation with chain-of-thought capabilities at edge pricing — offering a 131k context window, 150ms TTFT, and $0.30/1M input pricing ($0.080/1M cached reads).

Explore High-Priority Related Model Matchups