Which model is better: Gemma 4 31B IT or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Gemma 4 31B IT and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct share identical input pricing at $0.12 per 1M tokens ($0.36 vs. $0.30 output). In terms of operational performance, Gemma 4 31B IT delivers lower response latency at 115ms TTFT (30ms faster than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct) with 155 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. Gemma 4 31B IT leads coding evaluations at 59.2% SWE-bench Verified vs. 42.5% for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 71.2% vs. 55.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.
Zero-Shot RAG Verified
Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)
Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.
Metric / Dimension
Gemma 4 31B IT
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens
$0.12
$0.12
Identical Pricing
Output Cost / 1M Tokens
$0.36
$0.30
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (16.7% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M
$0.030
$0.030
Identical Cache Read Pricing
Prompt Cache Write / 1M
$0.12
$0.12
Identical Cache Write Pricing
Context Window (Max Output)
131k (16k out)
131k (33k out)
Equal Context Window
Avg TTFT Response Latency
115ms
145ms
Gemma 4 31B IT (30ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput)
155 tok/s
165 tok/s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (+10 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding)
59.2%
42.5%
Gemma 4 31B IT (+16.7% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM)
71.2%
55.6%
Gemma 4 31B IT (+15.6% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline)
82.8%
76.8%
Gemma 4 31B IT (+6.0% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic)
91.5%
77%
Gemma 4 31B IT (+14.5% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR)
80.3 / 100
74.6 / 100
Gemma 4 31B IT (+5.7 pts)
Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster
Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.
Which is cheaper: Gemma 4 31B IT or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Both Gemma 4 31B IT and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct share identical input pricing at $0.12/1M tokens.
Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: Gemma 4 31B IT or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Gemma 4 31B IT delivers faster first-token latency at 115ms TTFT (155 tok/s throughput) compared to 145ms TTFT (165 tok/s) for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
How do Gemma 4 31B IT and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?
On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, Gemma 4 31B IT scores 59.2% versus 42.5% for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, Gemma 4 31B IT scores 71.2% versus 55.6% for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (and 91.5% vs 77% on MATH-500).
When should you choose Gemma 4 31B IT?
Choose Gemma 4 31B IT (Google) for self-hosted VPC inference, fine-tuned domain agents, sovereign healthcare/finance workloads, and low-latency local code generation — offering a 131k context window, 115ms TTFT, and $0.12/1M input pricing ($0.030/1M cached reads).
When should you choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) for cost-optimized on-premise deployments, fast text transformation, structured entity extraction, and enterprise dialogue pipelines — offering a 131k context window, 145ms TTFT, and $0.12/1M input pricing ($0.030/1M cached reads).
