💰 Unit Cost Winner DeepSeek V3 $0.14/1M in · $0.28/1M out
⚡ Latency & Speed Winner DeepSeek V3 410ms TTFT · 78 tok/s
💻 Coding (SWE) Winner Grok 3 65.8% SWE-bench · 91.5% HumanEval
🧠 STEM Reasoning Winner Grok 3 84.6% GPQA · 89.8% MATH-500

Which model is better: DeepSeek V3 or Grok 3?

DeepSeek V3 is 95.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.28 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (21.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek V3 delivers lower response latency at 410ms TTFT (210ms faster than Grok 3) with 78 vs. 88 tok/s throughput. Grok 3 leads coding evaluations at 65.8% SWE-bench Verified vs. 42.0% for DeepSeek V3 and 84.6% vs. 59.1% on GPQA Diamond.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)

Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.

Metric / Dimension DeepSeek V3 Grok 3 Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $0.14 $3.00 DeepSeek V3 is 21.4x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $0.28 $15.00 DeepSeek V3 (98.1% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M $0.014 $0.750 DeepSeek V3 is 53.6x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M $0.14 $3.00 DeepSeek V3 is 21.4x cheaper
Context Window (Max Output) 131k (8k out) 134k (16k out) Grok 3 (1.0x larger context)
Avg TTFT Response Latency 410ms 620ms DeepSeek V3 (210ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput) 78 tok/s 88 tok/s Grok 3 (+10 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 42% 65.8% Grok 3 (+23.8% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM) 59.1% 84.6% Grok 3 (+25.5% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline) 75.9% 80% Grok 3 (+4.1% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic) 90.2% 89.8% DeepSeek V3 (+0.4% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 75 / 100 52.7 / 100 DeepSeek V3 (+22.3 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.

25.0M Tokens
500K 50M 250M 500M+
5.0M Tokens
100K 25M 75M 150M+
50% Cached
0% (Uncached) 25% 50% (Typical Agent) 95% Max

Estimated Monthly Spend

DeepSeek V3 $3.33

$0.14/1M in · $0.28/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.014/1M read · $0.14/1M write

Grok 3 $121.88

$3.00/1M in · $15.00/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.750/1M read · $3.00/1M write

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$118.55 / mo
(97.3% lower cost with DeepSeek V3)
Open Full Matchup Analysis →
A

When to Choose DeepSeek V3

Choose DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) for cost-sensitive batch text processing, drafting, and open-weight self-hosted inference — offering a 131k context window, 410ms TTFT, and $0.14/1M input pricing ($0.014/1M cached reads).

B

When to Choose Grok 3

Choose Grok 3 (xAI) for massive compute foundation model specialized in PhD-level science reasoning, real-time data analysis, and enterprise logic — offering a 134k context window, 620ms TTFT, and $3.00/1M input pricing ($0.750/1M cached reads).

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: DeepSeek V3 or Grok 3?

DeepSeek V3 is cheaper at $0.14/1M input tokens ($0.28/1M output) compared to $3.00/1M input ($15.00/1M output) for Grok 3.

Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: DeepSeek V3 or Grok 3?

DeepSeek V3 delivers faster first-token latency at 410ms TTFT (78 tok/s throughput) compared to 620ms TTFT (88 tok/s) for Grok 3.

How do DeepSeek V3 and Grok 3 compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?

On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, DeepSeek V3 scores 42% versus 65.8% for Grok 3. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, DeepSeek V3 scores 59.1% versus 84.6% for Grok 3 (and 90.2% vs 89.8% on MATH-500).

When should you choose DeepSeek V3?

Choose DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) for cost-sensitive batch text processing, drafting, and open-weight self-hosted inference — offering a 131k context window, 410ms TTFT, and $0.14/1M input pricing ($0.014/1M cached reads).

When should you choose Grok 3?

Choose Grok 3 (xAI) for massive compute foundation model specialized in PhD-level science reasoning, real-time data analysis, and enterprise logic — offering a 134k context window, 620ms TTFT, and $3.00/1M input pricing ($0.750/1M cached reads).

Explore High-Priority Related Model Matchups