Which model is better: GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?

GPT-5.6 Luna is 48.6% cheaper for input tokens ($0.18 vs. $0.35 per 1M tokens) and $0.72 vs. $0.40 for output tokens (1.9x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, GPT-5.6 Luna delivers faster response latency with 90ms TTFT (330ms faster than Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct). GPT-5.6 Luna leads coding benchmarks at 48.5% SWE-bench vs. 44.0% for Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta

Daily synchronized metrics from synthetic latency endpoints and benchmark evaluations.

Metric / Dimension GPT-5.6 Luna Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $0.18 $0.35 GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.9x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $0.72 $0.40 Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct (80% lower)
Avg TTFT Response Latency 90ms 420ms GPT-5.6 Luna (+330ms faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 48.5% 44% GPT-5.6 Luna (+4.5% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 99.9 / 100 99.9 / 100 Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct (+0 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model your expected production workload across prompt (input) and completion (output) tokens.

Live Calculation Engine
10.0M Tokens
100K 50M 250M 500M+
2.5M Tokens
100K 10M 50M 100M+

Estimated Monthly Spend

GPT-5.6 Luna $5.45

$0.18/1M in · $0.72/1M out

Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct $67.50

$0.35/1M in · $0.4/1M out

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$62.05 / mo
(91.9% lower cost)
A

When to Choose GPT-5.6 Luna

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when you need Real-time conversational agents, high-volume classification, intent detection, and low-latency interactive apps. and have an infrastructure budget aligned with $0.18/1M tokens.

B

When to Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct

Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct when you need Open-source dense flagship model offering state-of-the-art multi-language understanding, mathematical reasoning, and JSON generation. and prioritize Alibaba Cloud ecosystem integration at $0.35/1M tokens.

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper at $0.18/1M input tokens compared to $0.35/1M for Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct.

Which model has lower latency: GPT-5.6 Luna or Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?

GPT-5.6 Luna delivers faster response times with an average TTFT of 90ms vs 420ms for Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct.

When should you choose GPT-5.6 Luna?

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when you need Real-time conversational agents, high-volume classification, intent detection, and low-latency interactive apps. and have an infrastructure budget aligned with $0.18/1M tokens.

When should you choose Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct?

Choose Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct when you need Open-source dense flagship model offering state-of-the-art multi-language understanding, mathematical reasoning, and JSON generation. and prioritize Alibaba Cloud ecosystem integration at $0.35/1M tokens.

Explore Related Model Matchups